JK Rowling’s Anti-Transgender Stance and the Hogwarts Legacy
🌐
At first glance, the Harry Potter series seems to be in a healthy place.The lucrative Wizarding World franchise is getting a third installment, Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them, a TBS game show, an ongoing Broadway play, two theme parks, a potential live-action streaming series, and most players to watch Yes, the highly anticipated AAA returns to Avalanche Software’s Hogwarts Legacy game world.
Sadly, however, the series has been in the shadow of a larger conversation: creator JK Rowling’s public support for anti-trans rhetoric, and her support for the people and groups spreading it, all on social media Expression, her website, and her activism. This is not an isolated incident, but Rowling’s ongoing stance that dates back to 2018 and continues until March 2022 – at the time of this writing – when she tweeted about the upcoming issue of gender identification in Scotland Misinformation to vote, and numerous other tweets targeting trans people.
While discussions around trans issues may not directly affect most people outside of the trans community, Rowling’s redoubled efforts on trans issues have pushed the topic to many people’s minds when it comes to ongoing of the Harry Potter series. Given Rowling’s discriminatory words and actions, many of us need to consider whether we can still support the Harry Potter series. What does it mean to support Rowling? Also, considering that writers, producers, filmmakers, and developers have also contributed to the series, many of whom are directly opposed to Rowling’s stance, support for books that have gone beyond a single author Is the Lipot series still worth it? Some of you may also question whether Rowling’s words are harmful, given the intense politicization and seemingly contradictory messages surrounding the transgender discussion.
This is what I want to decompress as much as possible. The purpose of this article is not to provide a complete timeline of everything Rowling has said about trans people, but to touch on some of Rowling’s most important notes related to these issues and to provide a larger context around trans rights where Rowling’s words are Among them – especially in the US and UK, and investigate what all this means for those of us who are still excited about a Harry Potter work like Hogwarts Legacy. The purpose is not to give you answers about how you feel, but to give you the tools you need to think about your own issues. There are no easy answers here other than supporting and protecting the most vulnerable.
process of speech
Rowling’s words won her support from “Gender Critical Feminists” (GCF)*, who are sometimes referred to as “trans-exclusive radical feminists,” or TERFs. The GCF is a small but massive movement defined by their opposition to what they call “gender ideology,” the denial of trans and non-binary identities, against legislation that supports trans people, and argues that In particular, trans women are simply co-female identities of men in order to invade “female-only spaces” such as bathrooms, leading them to what they perceive as an erosion of cisgender women’s safety and rights. However, GCF’s actions are not only misguided on trans issues, but also use misinformation and rhetoric with clear vitriolic and damaging intent, and do so against the entire trans community, itself considered the most marginalized right now one of the communities.
Given the inherent complexity of discussing gender issues and the spread of misinformation about the trans community, coupled with the current politicized discourse around trans issues and attacks on trans rights in the US, UK and around the world, GCF and Rowling The discourse has often remained polarized and opaque to the wider public. If Rowling’s views on trans people are brought up, people outside the trans community will find themselves unsure of how to explain why her words are harmful – some see Rowling as just “defending women” or “asking questions” With regard to transgender issues, the very real negative effects they have are inadvertently downplayed.
The complexity in these conversations often benefits those who spread misinformation, as complexity can be used to prevent public defenses or basic discussions of marginalized trans communities. Instead, people are forced to sift through rhetoric and weed out misinformation before they can actually engage with the issues and feel empowered to commit to a point. This is probably where most people reading this at the moment find themselves when discussing trans issues: unsure of what to believe or how to best approach these topics for fear of what is right. Or, potentially, given that the politicized discourse around these topics is fueled by fear-mongering misinformation, one might even find themselves hostile to discussions of transgender rights, arguing that transgender issues are related to broader women’s rights and even The safety of children goes directly in the opposite direction. Ironically, while Rowling’s statements have been controversial in their platforming of this misinformation, they also provide a unique starting point to start cutting off the discourse.
gender critical feminists
After months of more indirect insinuations of anti-trans views, Rowling’s June 2020 publication of an article that directly reflects the mainstream views and arguments of the gender-critical movement has earned her anti-trans influence. reputation. While this article contains many misleading statements that have been thoroughly debunked, there are still some notable topics.
First, Rowling pointed to the concept of “rapidly occurring gender dysphoria” (ROGD), which assumes a sudden influx of young girls who suddenly identify as transgender and believe that this is due to social media or being transgender on social media Influencer and popular. Pop Culture. The theory is scientifically supported by a study by controversial former Brown assistant professor Lisa Littman. However, Litman’s research methods, such as surveying only parents in online forums that had been explicitly concerned with fast-onset gender dysphoria, were questioned by other researchers immediately after publication. While ROGD has been credibly debunked in numerous studies after the fact, Litman’s work has been consistently cited by many prominent GCFs, such as in the 2020 book “Irreversible Damage: The Transgender Craze That Seduces Our Daughters,” by Abigail Shrier .
Shrier’s book, along with Rowling’s paper and other GCF treatises, uses ROGD to inform their next focus: the detransitioner narrative. The argument is that many young girls who experience ROGD seek surgical interventions, such as breast reduction, only to later learn they are not transgender and regret making irreversible changes to their bodies, leading to depression and even suicidal thoughts. While this can happen, it is not common. First, children rarely undergo surgery until they reach the age of consent (usually 18 years or older), and these procedures often require authorization from doctors and therapists and require a year of consideration before proceeding. Most children who are under the age of consent are usually given access to a therapist or, if they are nearing puberty, are sometimes prescribed safe puberty-blocking drugs under the supervision of a doctor, which simply delays their puberty long enough Time for them to consider whether surgery is the right path for them. In addition, the National Center for Transgender Equality found that only 0.4 percent of transgender people gave up being transgender because they didn’t think the transition was right for them, and most of them never had a surgical intervention; several other studies have found similar results. In fact, most transgender people are due to discrimination faced by transgender people, not a lack of desire to transition. While some work should be done to prevent transition regrets, doing so requires better, more informed gender-affirming care so physicians can better assess the right path for transgender patients. In fact, it will also help more than 90% of trans people find their lives mentally and physically improved after the transition. Many GCFs dishonestly view detransition as the most important issue in trans-related health care, characterizing it as active and intentional child abuse, and in doing so justify the elimination of all trans health care.
While the GCF has often publicly stated that they believe only “some” trans women will target cisgender women, their language refers to all trans women and usually only discusses trans women in this context. It subtly characterizes all trans women as sexual predators and nothing more.
While these narratives primarily deal with adolescent children who were assigned female at birth, Rowling and GCF also focus on a different framing of trans women: those trans women who were assigned male at birth. In her article, Rowling noted, “When you open the bathroom and dressing room door to any man who believes or feels he is a woman — and, as I said, a gender confirmation certificate can now be granted without any surgery. Or hormones — and then you open the door for all men who want to come in. It’s a simple fact.” The argument made by Rowling and GCF is that trans women, who are constantly framed and misunderstood as “men appropriating women “Will use their identities as women to “invade” women’s spaces, such as restrooms or women’s prisons, to attack and harass cisgender women.
The GCF also argues that trans women try to pressure lesbians into having sex with them. A BBC article cites a gender-criticism group, despite the fact that the research it is based on can only conclude, “Ultimately, it is difficult to determine the true scale of the problem…” Nonetheless, The subject of this article revolves entirely around the possibility of trans women sexually assaulting cisgender lesbians. The article itself sparked widespread protests against the BBC, including one led by transgender activists.
While the GCF has often publicly stated that they believe only “some” trans women will target cisgender women, their language refers to all trans women and usually only discusses trans women in this context. It subtly characterizes all trans women as sexual predators and nothing more.
The power of rhetoric
While GCF uses more arguments, these narratives, highlighted and disseminated by Rowling herself, underscore two of the biggest themes in all discourse surrounding trans people in these groups: trans children, especially “young girls,” are abused Child and transgender victim women are only male sexual predators. On top of that, they also often ignore non-binary identities, referring only to non-binary people based on their assigned birth sex. While these narratives have the effect of infantilizing and ignoring the role of trans men in their own healthcare, the effects on trans women are often directly dangerous.
GCF often spreads misinformation about trans women, not because they actively realize it is misinformation, but because they truly believe it to be true. Many GCFs, usually women, cite a traumatic history of misogyny or even sexual assault. Rowling herself included a story in her article about facing abuse from her ex-husband. You’ll be hard-pressed to find any woman, trans or otherwise, who doesn’t feel the fear of harassment or assault in today’s world. Many GCFs are parents who are worried about their trans children and fall into these spaces seeking support and affirmation that their children are not truly trans…
Find more articles in our categories Gaming & News et encore Anime.
Thanks for visiting we hope our article JK Rowling’s Anti-Transgender Stance and the Hogwarts Legacy
, think about share the article on Facebook, twitter and e-mail with the hashtags ☑️ #Rowlings #AntiTransgender #Stance #Hogwarts #Legacy ☑️!
